12Jul
A workers’ comp hearing does not look like what most people picture from television. There is no jury. The setting is formal but not theatrical. By the time the hearing concludes, the Deputy Commissioner often has not yet heard testimony from the treating physician.
That gap between expectation and reality is where a lot of unnecessary stress comes from. Anyone preparing for a workers’ comp hearing benefits from knowing the actual mechanics ahead of time, not just the general idea that a hearing exists. If a claim has reached this stage through a workers’ compensation dispute, understanding what the hearing itself involves makes the process considerably less disorienting. Because hearings often involve complex medical evidence and procedural rules, working with a Charlotte workers’ compensation lawyer before the hearing can help you prepare more effectively.

A hearing is requested by filing Form 33 with the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Once that request is filed, the parties are required to attend mediation before the case can proceed to an actual hearing. A neutral mediator, not the Deputy Commissioner who would eventually hear the case, works with both sides to see if the dispute can settle without a formal hearing at all. Many disputes resolve at that mediation stage without ever reaching a Deputy Commissioner, though plenty do not.
If you’re unsure whether your injury qualifies for workers’ compensation benefits in the first place, our guide to compensable workers’ compensation injuries explains the legal standards in more detail. This article focuses on what happens after a dispute reaches the hearing stage.
North Carolina workers’ comp hearings are held before a Deputy Commissioner, a judicial officer within the Industrial Commission. There is no jury, and the format is closer to a focused administrative proceeding than a courtroom drama.
Most hearings follow a similar pattern.
The workers’ compensation hearing process at this stage is really about building a factual record. The Deputy Commissioner is not deciding the case in the room. They are gathering the pieces needed to decide it afterward.

The treating physician usually does not testify live at the hearing itself. Coordinating a doctor’s schedule around a specific hearing date, on top of an already packed patient load, is rarely practical.
Instead, medical testimony typically happens through depositions scheduled in the weeks or months after the hearing concludes. Both attorneys question the physician under oath, outside the hearing room. That transcript becomes part of the evidence the Deputy Commissioner eventually reviews. This means the hearing itself often wraps up before the medical picture is even fully in the record. Patients sometimes assume the hearing was the whole case, then find themselves waiting months for a decision while depositions and paperwork continue quietly in the background.
Before the hearing, both sides are required to submit lists to the Deputy Commissioner. Those lists identify who is expected to testify, which documents will be offered as exhibits, and which depositions will follow. This is not a formality. If a witness or document is left off that list, the other side can object, and the evidence may be excluded entirely.
Because of that rule, preparing for a hearing is less about gathering every possible document and more about making sure the right evidence is properly disclosed before the proceeding. It is more about deciding, well ahead of time, exactly what will be needed and making sure it is properly disclosed. A strong piece of medical documentation that never made the list does the case no good at all.

Good workers comp hearing preparation has less to do with rehearsing a script and more to do with consistency. The Deputy Commissioner is comparing testimony against the written record throughout the hearing, and gaps between the two stand out immediately.
Honest, specific answers tend to hold up far better under cross-examination than answers that sound rehearsed. A Deputy Commissioner who has heard hundreds of these cases notices the difference quickly.

Once the hearing concludes and any medical depositions are complete, both attorneys submit written contentions summarizing their arguments. The Deputy Commissioner then reviews the hearing transcript, the deposition testimony, the exhibits, and both sides’ contentions before issuing a written decision called an Opinion and Award.
That review process takes time. It is not unusual for the written decision to arrive weeks or months after the last deposition wraps up. That is one more reason the hearing date itself is not the finish line most people expect it to be. Either party may appeal an unfavorable decision to the Full Commission, which reviews the Deputy Commissioner’s ruling under its own procedures. That process is covered separately from the hearing mechanics discussed here.
Preparing for a workers’ compensation hearing is about more than knowing what to say. Understanding the process, reviewing your medical records, and being ready to explain how the injury has affected your ability to work can all make the experience less stressful and help present a clear, consistent record.
If your workers’ compensation claim is headed to a hearing, speaking with a workers’ compensation attorney well before the hearing date can help you understand what to expect and how to prepare.
Call US now:
